Abstract:
With the advent of computers as a medium in communication, this study took interest in
comparing Face-to-Face (FTF) and Computer-Mediated (CMC) Debate, specifically, on
determining the similarities and differences in terms of grammatical structure and style of
arguments. In comparing these arguments, the researcher observed inconsistencies in
grammatical structure in terms of: Subject-Verb Agreement, Voice, Parallelism, and Levels of
Usage. Specific techniques in style were also examined: Repetitions such as Key Words and
Phrases, Restatement of Important Sentences in Same Words, and Repetition of Idea in Different
Words. The frequency of usage in Rhetorical Devices such as the use of Questions, Illustrations,
Humor, Loaded Words, Figurative Language and Examples, was also monitored during the
actual FTF and CMC debates.
To precisely identify the similarities and differences between FTF and CMC debate, the
researcher employed the experimental design, which was specifically carried out through the use
of post-test only control group design. Teams composed of six members discussed a similar
proposition and delivered arguments following the rules of the Asian Parliamentary debate,
either through face-to-face communication or through computer chat.
Results of this study showed that debating face-to-face produced more inconsistencies in
grammatical structure than debating with the use of computers. In terms of style, Both FTF and
CMC debaters demonstrated the same preference for repetitions and rhetorical devices in
presenting their respective arguments. The only difference seen was that majority of the
techniques were more frequently used in FTF debate than in CMC debate.
From the results, it can be inferred that FTF and CMC methods of debate provide
advantages and disadvantages to the participants and to the arguments they deliver. Computers
can be also considered as a potential medium during debates since they provide opportunity for
training debaters regardless of distance and location. In order to make the usage of CMC debate
more effective, debating organizations should provide written standards including raising Points
of Information, inquiry and system lag.
